Democracy and law are unity in the framework of democratic government. In the application of the concept, the aplication of the concept that underwent changes as stipulated in the 1945 contitution article 18 paragraph 4 governors, regent, mayor, resvectively as regional heads of provices, regencies, and cites are democratically elected.
The implementation is then dicetly elected based on the principles of direct, genneral, free, confidential, honest and fair. The election lives legal consequences for the implementation process so that there must be legal certanty in resolving dispute over election result. And most important asa a means to fulfill a sense of legal justice.Â
A spacial judicial body as referred to in article 157 paragraph 1 regarding dispute over result shall be established prior to the implementation of national simultaneous elections. In law no. of 2017 article 468 and article 469 the provisions for violations that are administrative in nature, or dispute resolution processes are an authoryty and obligationelection supervisory body, or (Bawaslu).
Then given the authoruty as a judicial qwasi iinstitution, to decide on dispute between election participans, and as a result of the issuance of a brigade ba, or decree dcree, by the KPU election organizers. Within the framework of legal and theories regarding the establisment af a. spacial judicial body, presumably it can become the legal basis as stipulste in the law above. About the spacial judiciary.
Keywords: Democracy, Law Justice, Spacial Justice,Â
Dispute Resolution. Law 10 of 2016
        Â
Â
BAB 1
PENDAHULUAN
Latar Belakang MasalahÂ
