Dapat kita jelaskan bagaimana interaksi antara agen dan struktur mempengaruhi munculnya kejahatan struktural dalam teori Giddens Anthony. Pemahaman ini membantu kita melihat kejahatan sebagai fenomena sosial yang kompleks, di mana tindakan individu dipengaruhi oleh struktur sosial yang ada, dan sebaliknya, tindakan individu dapat mempengaruhi dan membentuk struktur sosial yang ada.
CITASI
1. Bentham, Jeremy. (1995). Panopticon; or, The Inspection-House: Containing the Idea of a New Principle of Construction Applicable to any Sort of Establishment, in Which Persons of Any Description Are to Be Kept Under Inspection; and in Particular to Penitentiary-Houses, Prisons, Houses of Industry, Work-Houses, Poor-Houses, Lazarettos, Manufactories, Hospitals, Mad-Houses, and Schools; With a Plan of Management Adapted to the Principle: In a Series of Letters, Written in the Year 1787, from Crecheff in White Russia, to a Friend in England. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Vol. IV). Edinburgh: William Tait.
2. Foucault, Michel. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
3. Giddens, Anthony. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Sutanto, T. (2010). Kejahatan Struktural dalam Perspektif Teori Giddens. Jurnal Sosiologi, 15(2), 113-126..
5. Wardani, L. P., & Wardoyo, S. (2019). Konsep Kejahatan Struktural Giddens Anthony dan Implikasinya dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Kriminologi, 4(2), 169-184.
