Untuk dapat mewujudkan prinsip ekuitas dan pemerataan pendidikan, ada perlunya untuk merombak sistem yang ada sehingga menekan kesenjangan dalam peluang masuk dan lebih peduli terhadap latar belakang mahasiswa.
*) Oleh Roes Ebara Gikami Lufti | Ilmu Ekonomi 2017 | Staf Kajian Kanopi 2018
Daftar Pustaka
Footnote (yang dipakai secara spesifik di-cite dalam teks) - berdasarkan urutan muncul
Nelson, L. (2015). Does the SAT favor certain groups of people?.
Caner, A., & Okten, C. (2013). Higher education in Turkey: Subsidizing the rich or the poor?. Economics Of Education Review, 35, 75-92. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.03.007
Kim, Y., Kim, Y., & Loury, G. (2014). Widening Gap in College Admission and Improving Equal Opportunity in South Korea. Global Economic Review, 43(2), 110-130. doi: 10.1080/1226508x.2014.920241
Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2005). Effect of Private Tutoring on University Entrance Examination Performance in Turkey [Discussion Paper]. Institute for the Study of Labor. Retrieved from ftp.iza.org/dp1609.pdf
Briggs, D. (2009). Preparation for College Admission Exams (p. 12). National Association for College Admission Counseling. Retrieved from files.eric.ed.gov
i Yun Lee, 2013, Private tutoring and its impact on students' academic achievement, formal schooling, and educational inequality in Korea, Columbia University Academic Commons, https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K64R8K.
Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow Education: Private Supplementary Tutoring and Its Implications for Policy Makers in Asia [Ebook] (pp. 32-36). Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from adb.org
