Ecocentrism, Antrophocentrism In Philosophy and Environmental Ethics

where the environment is constantly in contact with human existence and that of all other living things in order to suit their requirements. This serves as justification for why humans exploit nature as they ought to due of an innate need to satisfy their wants, even when along the route there is not insignificant environmental harm caused by humans' own acts. 

Therefore, it is quite regrettable that people, with all of their greed, have turned into the primary agents of environmental degradation, which is a crucial aspect of their life.

One of the reasons why the development viewpoint (paradigm), which refers to the ethics of anthropocentrism and is based on the claim made by Aristotle in his book The Politics that plants are produced for the benefit of animals, is incorrect is the ongoing environmental devastation. 

The incorrect viewpoint that holds that nature and all of its components are only a method of satiating the desires and requirements of human life, making humans engage in acts of exploitation without making any attempts at betterment.

Anthropocentrism is the study of humans as it relates to anthropology studies. An Introduction to Anthropology by Simon Coleman and Helen Watson, published in 1992, defines anthropology as the study of people and society, both alive and dead, as well as their development and genetic makeup. 

According to Alfred Louis Kroeber, anthropology is the most humanist field of study while the humanities are the most scientific fields of inquiry. Anthropology embraces the creative component while utilizing scientific research techniques and analytical ideas.

There are seven levels of categorization for the viewpoints of society and organizations based on these two approaches. frist, in the beginning, is a simple viewpoint that only seeks and pursues profit. Second, it demonstrates how businesses are starting to recognize their social duty. 

Third, those who support the social compact, who believe that the company has carried out these social responsibility activities. Fourth, social ecologists, who hold the belief that a company must be able to address the issues it creates.

 Fifth, socialists hold that all property is public property and that there is no such thing as private property. Sixth, radical feminists are philosophies that oppose mastery-based patriarchal or masculine ideologies. Fundamentally, when there is a problem, what is required is mutual cooperation, without even making gender distinctions. Seventh, the deep ecologists hold that humans have no business interfering with nature's ability to survive and thrive.

Consequential theory and non consequential theory are the two categories into which conventional philosophy or conventional ethics can be split. According to the consequential ethic, the value of something is determined by the outcomes and objectives attained. 

While the non consequential theory is a moral philosophy that determines what is good or wrong based on how a procedure is carried out. Researchers can draw the conclusion that firms carry out social duty to the environment based on several purposes after applying the philosophy. An organization's ongoing evolution does not include any noticeable changes.