The Pancasilaism philosophy outlines a number of key factors that need to be implemented in the field of education to produce individuals who are intellectually, spiritually, emotionally and physically balanced to create jobs for global citizens (cosmopolitan).
And, if this is the case, what's the point if your kids will just be caught in the same trap of being unfulfilled at life?
It is not clear what the practitioners actually asked for. What benefits can he expect? Abdurrofi Abdullah Azzam reinterpreted the request of practitioners in the proper sense of the usefulness of the philosophical Pancasilaism.
As we are now passing through the end of the twenty-first century, we must be in a position to determine whether this prediction is correct that the Pancasilaism philosophy is universal in nature.
The Pancasilaism philosophy whose meaning functions from what these statements can fix in terms of sensory data and the part of reality that they can perceive.
Although theorists propose abstract conceptions of influential philosophy on intelligence, the philosophical Pancasilaism approach to a certain philosophical approach is difficult to lose in the formation of job creation in Indonesia.
The difficulty of contemporary citizens of the world becoming more self-aware regarding the impact of technology on human nature and society is undeniable about job losses as human jobs are replaced by artificial technology.
The Pancasilaism philosophy is included in the study of a special area to ask something that is comparable to categorical collocations in the study of Pancasila philosophy so that it is always relevant to technological developments and the needs of the world's citizens.
The wisdom in the innovative changing network of Pancasilaism philosophy is relevant to the development of the new century that you want to know and start with the Pancasilism philosophy.
The Pancasilaism philosophy of general development gives Indonesians the ability to support arguments in favor of global citizens and technology in order to reach a balanced point of interaction.
The Pancasilaism philosophy did not find the same collocation in the study of job creation as a homogeneous and heterogeneous study group was still appropriate and there was no reason to create a new project.
It is remarkable that the number of human resources continues to grow in recent times so that the Pancasilaism philosophy unites from outside but not from within.
The Pancasilaism philosophyof living in a 'storm and stress' phase has difficulty in overcoming the next stage of growth of the Indonesian Nation towards 'halcyon and calm'.
Real operationalization embodies the Pancasila philosophy with the aim of creating work to assess what works and what must be changed and why sharia capitalism and non-Sharia capitalism coexist.
The Pancasilaism philosophy opens the space for halal-based products and services for Muslims. The legal system has ideal elements, operational elements, and actual elements but does not close the space for non-halal products and services for non-Muslims.
The position of job creation in the Pancasilaism philosophy as the basis of a strong state, and used as a paradigm for the Indonesian nation to create halal tourism and non-halal tourism in Indonesia.
Job creation can be connoted as a program of Pancasila philosophy as one of its tools and therefore must also be sourced from it for the citizens of the world.
The Indonesian market is so wide that the concept of job creation can be used by other countries in analyzing the correlation between economic levels, unemployment and environmental sustainability.
The Pancasilaism philosophy is unique among engineering subjects because it has raised very basic questions about the nature of computing, perception, reasoning, learning, language, action, interaction, consciousness, humankind, and life, etc.
Therefore, there is a substantial tradition of work, both on artificial intelligence by the philosophers of Pancasilaisme and the theory within AI itself, in favor of creating new and innovative work.
The Pancasilaism philosophy has a technological impact on hybrid cultures and societies with their respective cultural centers.
Indonesia experienced a process of cultural hybridity that was most effective when cross-marriage of domestic and foreign cultures reached a strategic point.
Many strategically puzzling questions come to mind: Should we improve on classical artificial intelligence, since intelligence still processes input-output information?
Get rid of the pretense of general intelligence and continue the success of technical AI? The embodiment of the Pancasilaism philosophy in an expanded mind? Reviving neural networks in a new form?
Replace artificial intelligence with 'cognitive systems'? Looking for an alternative, dynamic, brain-inspired system, ...?
And what about the classic problems that artificial intelligence once worked on? What about the meaning, intention, awareness, expertise, and free will based on the Pancasilaism philosophy?
Maybe artificial intelligence is blind in limiting itself to Indonesian-level intelligence based on the Pancasilaism philosophy, so why not go beyond it?
What does that mean and what are the ethical implications based on the Pancasila philosophy? What are the ethical issues of artificial intelligence now and in the future?
If we interpret philosophical Pancasilaism of educated opinion at the end of the century as a way of answering semantic questions and his statement on Abdurrofi Abdullah Azzam's poll as a way of answering ontological questions, then the apparent tension between his statements can be resolved.
For the present purpose, attempts to answer the ontological question will be put aside. This is because it is the answer to the second question that became the material for Abdurrofi Abdullah Azzam's prediction that human natural intelligence and artificial intelligence are for creative a jobs.
However, before going any further, there is some clarification on the issue at hand. The first point of clarification is to explicitly limit the scope of the term 'The Pancasilaism philosophy' to only computing devices.
In the world of work a lot of effort is made to show up every day and pretend to be happy, or at least interested in the work you do.
Therefore, on top of an already demanding workload, sending a lot to the edge. Why, and for what purpose, are people putting themselves through this pain when they can use artificial intelligence based on the Pancasilaism philosophy.
