Cognitive Science Society (pp. 194-199). Edinburgh, Scotland: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dickstein, M. (2010). STEM for all students: Beyond the silos. [White Paper].
Dugger, W. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the U.S. 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research.Â
Harden, R. (2000). The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Medical Education, 34(1), 551-557.
Hmelo, C.E., & Narayanan, N.H. (1995). Anchors, cases, problems, and scenarios as contexts for learning. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 5-8). Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
International Technology and Engineering Education Association (ITEEA). (2007). Standards for technological literacy (STL): Content for the study of Technology (3rd ed.). Reston,VA: Author.
Jacobs, H. (Ed.). (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kelley, T. (2010). Staking the claim for the 'T' in STEM. The Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 2-9.
Morrison, J., & Bartlett, R. (2009). STEM as curriculum. Education Week, 23, 28--31.
Novack, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or appropriate propositional hierarchies (liphs) leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548-571.
Rossouw, A., Hacker, M., & de Vries, M. (2010). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 409-424. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26
