Suharto's Crony Capitalism

Wurry Agus Parluten (WAP): Who is all time most corrupt man?

ChatGPT (GPT): Determining the "most corrupt" individual of all time can be subjective and controversial, as corruption can take many forms and is often difficult to quantify accurately. There have been numerous figures throughout history who have been accused or convicted of corruption. Some notable examples include Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines, Sani Abacha of Nigeria, and Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo). However, it's important to note that opinions on this matter may vary, and corruption is a complex issue that can involve many factors and perspectives.

WAP: Do you know Suharto?

GPT: Yes, I'm familiar with Suharto. Suharto was the second President of Indonesia, serving from 1967 to 1998. He came to power following a period of political instability and played a significant role in shaping Indonesia's modern history. However, his regime was also criticized for alleged human rights abuses and corruption. Suharto's presidency ended in 1998 amid widespread protests and economic turmoil. He passed away in 2008.

WAP: Is Suharto a corruptor?

GPT: Yes, Suharto's presidency was marred by allegations of corruption. During his long rule, he and his family were accused of amassing significant wealth through corrupt practices, including embezzlement and misappropriation of state funds. After his presidency ended in 1998, investigations into his wealth and allegations of corruption were launched, and some of his family members were prosecuted and found guilty of corruption-related charges. While opinions on the extent of his involvement in corruption may vary, there is substantial evidence to suggest that corruption was a significant issue during his time in power.

WAP: How much money corrupt by Suharto?

GPT: The exact amount of money that was allegedly embezzled or misappropriated by Suharto and his family during his presidency is difficult to determine with precision. Estimates of the total wealth amassed by the Suharto family vary widely, with some sources suggesting that it could be in the billions of dollars. Investigations into their assets and financial dealings have revealed significant amounts of money and assets held by the family, both in Indonesia and abroad.

However, due to the secretive nature of these financial dealings and the complex web of corruption, it's challenging to provide an accurate figure. Various efforts have been made over the years to recover assets that were believed to have been obtained through corrupt practices, but a definitive total amount remains elusive.

WAP: How much money corrupt by Suharto's era?

GPT: The exact amount of money that was allegedly corrupt during Suharto's era is a subject of debate and speculation. Suharto's regime spanned several decades, and corruption was known to be widespread during his time in power. Estimates of the total amount of money involved in corruption during his era can vary widely, and there is no universally accepted figure.

Some reports and estimates suggest that the amount of money embezzled or misappropriated during Suharto's rule could be in the billions of dollars. The corruption was facilitated through various means, including state-owned enterprises, government contracts, and crony capitalism.

However, it's important to note that accurate data on the exact amount of money involved in corruption during Suharto's era can be difficult to obtain due to the secretive nature of such activities and the lack of transparency during his rule.

WAP: Who are Suharto's crony capitalism?

GPT: During Suharto's presidency, a number of individuals and companies were closely associated with what is often referred to as "crony capitalism." These were individuals and entities that benefited from close connections to the Suharto regime and were able to secure favorable business deals, government contracts, and other economic advantages. Some of the most prominent figures and conglomerates associated with Suharto's crony capitalism include:

1. Tommy Suharto: Suharto's youngest son was involved in various business ventures and reportedly benefited from his family's political connections.

2. Bob Hasan: An influential businessman with close ties to Suharto, Hasan was involved in the timber and forestry industry.

3. Sudwikatmono: Suharto's brother-in-law was involved in various business ventures, including the automotive industry.

4. Liem Sioe Liong (Salim Group): A prominent Chinese-Indonesian businessman who had close ties to Suharto and operated in various industries, including banking, agriculture, and manufacturing.

5. Prajogo Pangestu: Another businessman with ties to Suharto, Pangestu was involved in the textile and petrochemical industries.

6. Astra International: A conglomerate that had close connections to the Suharto regime and was involved in various industries, including automotive, finance, and agribusiness.

These are just a few examples of individuals and companies that were associated with Suharto's crony capitalism. These connections allowed them to benefit from preferential treatment and access to resources, often at the expense of fair competition and transparency in the Indonesian economy.

WAP: Is Sudwikatmono from 21 Cineplex?

GPT: Yes, Sudwikatmono is indeed associated with the 21 Cineplex Group. Sudwikatmono is the brother-in-law of Suharto, the former President of Indonesia. He has been involved in various business ventures, including the entertainment industry. Sudwikatmono is known for his ownership and involvement in the 21 Cineplex Group, which is one of the largest cinema chains in Indonesia. The group operates numerous movie theaters across the country, offering a variety of films to audiences.

WAP: Who is owner of 21 Cineplex Group now?

GPT: As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, Sudwikatmono and his family were associated with the ownership and management of the 21 Cineplex Group. However, ownership details of companies can change over time, and I recommend checking the most recent and reliable sources for the current ownership status of the 21 Cineplex Group.

WAP: Is "21 Cineplex Group" affiliate with Suharto's Crony Capitalism?

GPT: Yes, the 21 Cineplex Group, which is one of the largest cinema chains in Indonesia, has been associated with Suharto's era of crony capitalism. Sudwikatmono, who is a relative of Suharto, was involved with the ownership and management of the 21 Cineplex Group. During Suharto's presidency, individuals and entities with close ties to his regime often benefited from preferential treatment and business advantages, which is a hallmark of crony capitalism. While Sudwikatmono's involvement doesn't necessarily imply wrongdoing, it does illustrate the intertwining of business and politics during that era. Keep in mind that my information is based on knowledge available up to September 2021, and there may have been developments since then.

WAP: Do you know Benny Suherman from 21 Cineplex Group?

GPT: As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, I don't have specific information about an individual named Benny Suherman in relation to the 21 Cineplex Group. Please note that my information might be outdated, and I recommend checking the most recent and reliable sources for accurate information about individuals associated with the 21 Cineplex Group.

WAP: Do you know Harris Lesmana from 21 Cineplex Group?

GPT: As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, I don't have information about an individual named Harris Lesmana in relation to the 21 Cineplex Group. It's possible that developments have occurred since then that I'm not aware of. If Harris Lesmana is a new addition or figure of importance in the 21 Cineplex Group, I recommend checking the most recent and reliable sources for up-to-date information.

WAP: 21 Cineplex Group affiliate with Suharto's Crony Capitalism. Is it mean "21 Cineplex Group" corrupt too?

GPT: The association of a business or organization with a particular era of crony capitalism does not necessarily mean that the entire entity is corrupt. While some businesses may have BENEFITED FROM POLITICAL CONNECTIONS and preferential treatment during such periods, it's important to consider each case individually.

The involvement of a business or its owners in crony capitalism may raise ethical and transparency concerns, but it doesn't automatically make the entire organization corrupt. Corruption often involves a complex web of individuals, practices, and decisions, and NOT ALL ASPECTS OF A BUSINESS MAY BE AFFECTED.

If you have concerns about the 21 Cineplex Group's history or practices, it's a good idea to look into reputable sources, consider various perspectives, and gather as much information as possible before forming a judgment. Keep in mind that discussions of corruption can be nuanced and require careful consideration of the facts.

WAP: How corruption can affect cinema business?

GPT: Corruption can have various negative effects on a cinema business:

1. Unfair Competition: Corrupt practices can lead to unfair advantages for certain cinemas or theater chains, making it difficult for honest businesses to compete on a level playing field.

2. Quality and Customer Experience: Corruption might divert funds away from maintaining and improving the quality of facilities, services, and screenings. This can result in poor customer experiences, impacting the reputation of the cinema.

3. Lack of Innovation: Corruption can stifle innovation as resources that could have been invested in new technologies, better amenities, or creative programming may be misused or misallocated.

4. Limited Choice and Diversity: If corrupt practices lead to monopolies or undue favoritism, it can limit the diversity of films shown and the types of experiences available to moviegoers.

5. Economic Impact: Money siphoned off due to corruption could otherwise contribute to the local economy, creating jobs, supporting suppliers, and generating tax revenue.

6. Trust and Reputation: Being associated with corrupt practices can tarnish a cinema's reputation, leading to decreased trust among patrons and stakeholders.

7. Legal Consequences: Engaging in corrupt activities could lead to legal repercussions, fines, or sanctions that damage the business's financial stability.

8. Investor Confidence: Corrupt practices can discourage potential investors from getting involved with the cinema industry, which can hinder growth and expansion opportunities.

9. Industry Growth: Corruption can hinder the overall growth and development of the cinema industry, limiting its potential contributions to the entertainment sector and the economy as a whole.
Overall, corruption can undermine the integrity of the cinema business and negatively impact its ability to provide quality entertainment and services to customers.

[21/8 22.31] PENDEKAR SUFI: Jd teringat, waktu arwah Soeharto naek ke langit (ntah surga atw neraka) dia liat karangan bunga panjangnya 6 km, apa arwahnya merasa bahagia? Wkwkwkwk...

[21/8 22.57] SANG PEJALAN: Kok tau? Xixixixixi...

[21/8 23.00] WURRY AGUS PARLUTEN: Hadeh! Telaah #CyberpunkIndonesia terkait #35Busd.