Regarding the viral incident in the campus area, the rectorate of Gunadarma University emphasized that it would process students who committed acts of sexual harassment and persecution.
This is because the actions committed by perpetrators of sexual harassment and persecution in the campus environment are considered to defame Gunadarma's alma mater. Vice Rector 3 of Gunadarma University, Irwan Bastian, said that his party would sanction according to the rules in force at Gunadarma University.
"When there are students who make mistakes, we take action according to the rules on the Gunadarma campus," Irwan told reporters, Wednesday (12/14/2022).
Furthermore, Irwan said that currently the rectorate is still exploring cases of sexual harassment that have happened to more than one victim.
However, the so-called act of persecution of students to impose social sanctions on alleged perpetrators is also unjustified. Therefore, the rectorate of Gunadarma University ensured that it would process the two cases.
We can conclude that the above case is included in the morality of decency in socializing. Morality is a term that certainly cannot be separated from the word moral. Morals themselves have a meaning (teaching about) good and bad that is generally accepted regarding deeds, attitudes, obligations, and so on.
Morals are often referred to as morals, ethics, or morals. Morals are explicitly things related to the process of socialization of the individual. Without morals man cannot carry out the process of socialization. Moral is the actions/behaviors/utterances of a person in interacting with other human beings.
If what a person does is in accordance with the taste values prevailing in society, then that person is considered to have good morals, and vice versa. A human being who has no morals is called immoral meaning that he is immoral and has no positive value in the eyes of other human beings.
Gunadarma students perpetrators and defenders of victims who are even the same have no morals in socializing. whose intention is to defend but do something inappropriate to do it should be done, especially by students who in fact understand things that smell like the law, not even vigilantes who even harass the perpetrators. Then what is the difference between the defender and the perpetrator?
