This shows that the British Government successfully applied the concept of securitization as explained by Barry Buzan. At that time, the British government, especially the food minister had become a secure actor by carrying out rhetorical actions or known as speech acts, related to carrots. They effectively used carrots as a symbol to convey a message of safety to the public, although there was actually no direct link between carrot consumption and the radar technology actually used by the RAF at the time.
A Political Strategy Disguised as Health Promotion
This practice is not just a Health promotion effort, it is also a careful political strategy. The government uses rhetoric to turn issues that are not really security threats into issues that are considered threats, with the aim of mobilizing public support to maintain national security stability. In addition, the consumption of carrots was also aimed at dealing with the oversupply of carrots at the time and the shortage of other food sources due to the naval blockade by Germany, this shows that the use of carrots in this context is not only symbolic, but also a practical response to the emergency situation facing the country. Thus, this practice is an example of how the concept of securitization can be used in real situations to achieve broader goals, both political and economic practice.
As highlighted in Kate Murphy's book, "Dig for Victory: The Story of Wartime Gardening in Britain", the British government also launched campaigns to encourage citizens to grow their own food, including carrots, during the war. This initiative was part of a broader strategy to ensure food security and self-sufficiency in response to the challenges posed by the war. The "Dig for Victory" campaign not only promoted the practical benefits of home gardening but also reinforced the idea of communal effort and resilience, further integrating the consumption and cultivation of carrots into the national narrative of survival and solidarity during the war.
