Mohon tunggu...
Muhebullah Jamali
Muhebullah Jamali Mohon Tunggu... Pelajar Sekolah - masters of Human Resources Development at Airlangga University

My hobbies writing essay, journal articles. watching sports, shopping, eating and reading books

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Ilmu Sosbud

Balancing Act: Pointing the TikTok Ban in Indonesia- Innovation, Regulations and The Future of Social Commerce

3 Desember 2023   16:43 Diperbarui: 3 Desember 2023   16:51 84
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Ilmu Sosbud dan Agama. Sumber ilustrasi: PEXELS

There have been both positive and negative effects from Indonesia's ban on TikTok stores. Positively, the regulatory action takes care of important consumer protection concerns. The government wants to protect consumers from fraudulent activity, fake products, and dishonest advertising that could flourish in an unregulated online marketplace by enforcing strict regulations. This action is in line with the overarching objective of protecting online consumers' welfare and promoting a safe marketplace.

Furthermore, one benefit of the prohibition is its emphasis on tax compliance. The government wants to reduce tax evasion within the TikTok shop ecosystem, so it's setting clear taxation guidelines. In addition to increasing the country's revenue, this creates an even playing field for businesses and guarantees that they meet their financial obligations to the government. This makes the ban a step in the direction of developing a more transparent and accountable corporate environment.

On the other hand, detractors contend that the prohibition may inhibit creativity and limit opportunities for entrepreneurship. Small companies and independent artists now have a distinctive way to market and sell their goods to a large audience through TikTok shops. The direct ban runs the risk of stifling the development of creative business strategies that take advantage of the fusion of social media and online shopping. A more nuanced strategy that involves cooperation between industry players and the government could strike a balance between the promotion of entrepreneurial endeavors and the necessity of protecting consumers. The effectiveness of the prohibition ultimately depends on striking the correct balance between regulation and the promotion of a dynamic and creative e-commerce environment.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, Indonesia's government's proactive response to address justifiable concerns about tax compliance and consumer protection in the context of the rapidly changing social media-driven e-commerce sector is reflected in the ban on TikTok shops. Although the measures are intended to give online shoppers a sense of security and transparency, there is also an acknowledgment of possible disadvantages. There are concerns about how to strike a balance between regulation and promoting a dynamic business environment because of the possibility of stifling innovation and impeding entrepreneurial opportunities, especially for small businesses. In order to shape the future of online marketplaces in Indonesia and elsewhere, it is imperative that a nuanced approach be found that addresses the identified issues without stifling the innovative spirit of emerging e-commerce models. This is where the debate lies.

Baca konten-konten menarik Kompasiana langsung dari smartphone kamu. Follow channel WhatsApp Kompasiana sekarang di sini: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaYjYaL4Spk7WflFYJ2H

HALAMAN :
  1. 1
  2. 2
Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Ilmu Sosbud Selengkapnya
Lihat Ilmu Sosbud Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun