0
Bad
Total
20
100
Table 4.2.g shows the various scores gotten by the students regarding their ability level in writing composition. There is no student (0%) gets score 26-30 (Excellent) and gets scores 21-25 (Very Good). There are 15 students (75%) get scores 16-20 (Good). There are 5 students (25%) gets scores 11-15 (Average). There is no student (0%) gets score 6-10 (Below Average) and gets score 0-5 (Bad).
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
In this chapter, the writer explains about the conclusions and suggestions based on the result of the study.
5.1Conclusions
After long analysis on students’ compositions, the writer comes out to write the following conclusions:
1.The Third Year Students of SMPK St. Yoseph Kupang are able to write composition.
2.The students’ level of ability is 16.8 (Good).
5.2Suggestions
Although the result of the study shows that the students are able to write a composition with the level are good, the writer needs to propose the following suggestions:
1.The teacher needs to consider the students’ English grammar, vocabulary, and fluency because this study proves that the students committed many mistakes on those aspects.
2.The students are required to enrich their grammar, vocabulary; particularly the use of appropriate tenses, regular and irregular verbs, the use of auxiliary verbs, and the use of full verbs in the sentences.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ackley et al. 1986. Macmillan English - 9th Ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
___________. 1986. Macmillan English - 12th Ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Brougthon et al. 1980. Teaching English as a Foreign Language - 2nd Ed. London: University Of London Institute Of Education.
Calderonello et al. 1986. The Process of Writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Farraro, Vincent and Palmer, Kathrin C. Article – Speaking and Arguing: The Rhetoric of Peace and War Differences Between Oral and Written Communication. Retrieved on November, 26th, 2008 for World Wide Web.
Hamka, Sunardi U. 2007. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Method in Teaching Writing for Junior High School Students. Retrieved on March, 12th, 2009 for World Wide Web: http://Sunardiuhamka07.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/computer-assisted-language-learning-method-in-teaching-writing-for-junior-high-school-students/
Hornby et al.1958. The Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, Arthur. 1989. Testing For Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
McCrimmon, James M. 1976. Writing with A Purpose - 6th Ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Mifflin, Hougthon. 1984. Grammar and Composition - 3rd Ed. Lawrenceville: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill Contemporary.
Oshima, Alice. And Hogue, Ann. 1991. Writing Academic English-3rd. New York: Longman
Richards et al. 1985. Longman Dictionary Applied Linguistics. London: Longman Publishing Company.
Rosswinterwood, et al, 1985: English Writing and Skill - 3rd Ed. San Diego: Colorado Publisher.
Kouttjie,Traciana Ch. 2007. Unpublished Thesis: An Analysis Of Errors Committed In Writing Composition Of The Key Stage 1 Students Of English Nusantara Kupang. Kupang
Walvoord, Barbara Fassler. 1985. Writing Strategies for All Disciplines. New Jersey: Loyola College: Englewood Cliffs.
Wishon et al. 1980. Let’s Write English - Revised Edition. New York: American Book Company.
