Conclusion
The other challenge for ASEAN is that ASEAN is not part of ROs. If European Union has NATO, ASEAN does not have any unity-military action, nor political judgement to deliver military intervention if there is a lawsuit against false conduct of transferring knowledge and information of research results within MEA. Considering of that challegings and limitations of ASEAN soft-diplomacy, this paper urges all ASEAN bodies to continue their best efforts to re-design the objectives of its foundation, while there must be a high level conference of ASEAN leaders to meet each other to discuss more about the future of ASEAN geopolitics, that must be more united and more integrated to prevent such conflict of interest in ASEAN. This agenda of integrity, including Transferring Knowledge and Information of Resarch Results of MEA, must be included on ASEAN Charter more clearly.
Wallâhu’l-Muwaffiq ilâ Aqwami at-Tharîq.
Bibliography
Barton, Greg. 2010. Indonesia: Legitimacy, Secular Democracy, and Islam, Politics&Policy, Volume 38, No.3 (2010), Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Boellstorff, Tom. 2005. Between Religion and Desire: Being Muslim and Gay in Indonesia, American Antrophologist, Dec 2005, 107, 4 , Arts&Humanities Database, pg.575.
Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia. (2008). Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.
Buku Doktrin Pertahanan Indonesia. (2007). Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.
Candland, Christopher. 2000. Faith as Social Capital: Religion and Community Development in Southern Asia, Policy Sciences, Dec 2000, 33, 3; Technology Collection. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cobban, Alfred. 1970. A History of Modern France. Great Britain: Penguin Books Ltd.
Formichi, Chiara. 2015. Re(Writing) the History of Political Islam in Indonesia, Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia Vol.30, No.1 (2015), pp.105-40.