Mohon tunggu...
Indonesian Student Association For International Studies ISAFIS
Indonesian Student Association For International Studies ISAFIS Mohon Tunggu... -

Indonesian Student Association for International Studies (ISAFIS) had been established since 14th February 1984. ISAFIS is a non-profit students organization, with the purpose to build the vision of mutual understanding among nations through youth cooperation. Along the way in its 30th year, ISAFIS has grown through deepening the coherence between its internal divisions' coordination, while widening efforts of its works for youth empowerment. The members are students from universities in Jabodetabek: University of Indonesia, Trisakti University, Paramadina University, Pelita Harapan University, Paramadina University, Bogor Institute of Agriculture, and many more.

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Money

Economics Side of Multiculturalism

24 Desember 2017   21:05 Diperbarui: 8 Januari 2018   11:35 744
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Bagikan ide kreativitasmu dalam bentuk konten di Kompasiana | Sumber gambar: Freepik

Written by: Dinis Dwi Shinta R - Research and Development ISAFIS

A wide variety of ethnic groups are living coexistent worldwide. Migration that has been taking place since centuries ago spurs the spread of these ethnic groups across the globe. Interaction and collaboration among ethnic groups in terms of identities, languages, religions, and cultures in the same place and at the same time will result in a culturally diverse society. 

As a result, the society will feel the exposure to multiculturalism. Being one of the phenomena which is widely happening within the society, multiculturalism in fact affects various aspects of society. Speaking of multiculturalism, a lot of people will affiliate it with something like nation's stability---a widely-spoken issue. Meanwhile, this article is going to explain further about one interesting aspect that is affected by multiculturalism, but hardly attains attention and in-depth explanation. That one aspect is the economic development of a nation.

A lot of people hold dear the belief that economic development of a nation only relies on economic factors, such as availability of natural resources, technological innovation, and human capital. Surprisingly, numerous recent studies concluded that cultural diversity also takes part in influencing economic development. It is a contributor, not a result. A study conducted in 2011 by Quamrul Ashraf of Williams College and Oded Galor of Brown University suggested that cultural diversity spurs economic development, while homogeneity slows it down. This conclusion emerged after a study they did showed the correlation between cultural diversity as well as geographical proximity with economic growth from pre-industrial era to the modern era.

Ashraf and Galor managed to examine the great divergence in economic development which occurred during industrial revolution. The rate of western countries' economic development was far outpacing the rest of the world. The ratio between the GDP of the richest and the poorest regions of the world increased from 3 : 1 prior to industrial revolution to an astounding 18 : 1 after industrial revolution. Since then, a lot of notions were contemplated to conclude the main trigger of the West's giant leap in economic development.

Classic studies suggested that it was distinctive cultural norms and values that triggers the West's economic development. Meanwhile, Douglas North and Robert Thomas implied in their book The Rise of the Western World that it was the institution that arose under the democratic development which triggered technological innovation that resulted in economic development. On the other hand, Ashraf and Galor believed that it was a region's openness to other culture that would propel an economic development. To arrive at this conclusion, they developed Geographical Isolation Index to measure two things: the effect of geographic isolation on cultural diversity and the effect of cultural diversity on economic development.

Geographic isolation made it harder for cultural diffusion to take place, so the society felt less exposure to cultural diversity. In pre-industrial era, this kind of society benefited from intense accumulation of society-specific human capital. This let them to develop in the technological paradigm of the agricultural stage. In contrast, after industrialization took place, geographic isolation and economic development were indeed inversely related. The more isolated a region, the less economic development occurred. 

It happened because cultural homogeneity and rigidity diminished the ability of the society within this region to adapt to new technological advancement. As a result, their industrialization as well as their economic development were delayed. Turned out, the fact that cultural diversity has a positive impact towards economic development is still relevant until now in the modern era.

Cultural diversity is argued to possess capability in generating increase in GDP and market productivity---the key indicators of economic development. If widely accepted by the society within a region, cultural diversity could increase GDP from services sectors, specifically tourism and education. Besides, cultural diversity also could construct a firm global linkage which will raise market productivity.

Tourism is always a major attraction of a country to draw visitors spending. Respectively, visitors spending will contribute to the increase in GDP. The more the merrier, it is. Oftentimes, tourism is highly influenced by cultural richness of a country. That's why cultural diversity is an important player in strengthening income flow from tourism. 

Cultural festivals and events could never go wrong to enhance visitation to certain countries. Compounded with ethnic enclaves, they together broaden tourism offer and capitalize the desire for new and varied cultural experiences. Ethnic enclaves in which people with the same cultural background live in a concentrated area and showcase mother countries' culture will add a comparative advantage with competing tourist destinations. 

We could sense the atmosphere of being in Italy even though we are in the USA if we visit Little Italy in New York, USA. The same thing works for Chinatowns in Japan and Europe Street in China. These ethnic enclaves are win-win circumstance for both the visitors and the destination country. Visitors will think that they save travel fare for they could experience different atmospheres within the same country with the existence of this culturally diverse society. On the other hand, the destination country will gain more income flow from tourism.

Besides international tourists, more income for GDP flow also comes from international students. Ethnically diverse environment would attract more international students, so it could enhance country's GDP from educational sector. This kind of environment appears interesting to international students because it generates a range of education benefits, such as improved understanding of racial and cultural diversity, enhanced openness to diversity, and greater satisfaction in experiencing education. This argument is supported by a study conducted by Jeffrey E. Millem of the University of Arizona. He assessed the impact of culturally diverse education environment in tertiary institutions and the result showed a positive relationship. It is also proven by the fact that Australian education contributes $17 billion to its GDP in 2014, constituting education as the fourth largest export within the country. Australia itself is the second most culturally diverse country in which cohesive cultural diversity contributes to the appeal of Australia as an education destination and thereby continue the growth of Australia's GDP.

Next to the growing interest on tourism and education, cultural diversity also brings with itself a construction of global linkage. Cultural diversity within a place which is accompanied by adequate amount of tolerance is essential to attract knowledgeable workers---the creative class. This creative class people are the ones who would majorly contribute to the countries' long-term economic development as world's economy is driven by innovation and ideas. Besides, these knowledgeable workers with wide variety of cultural backgrounds would further enrich the environment with different skills and perspectives which often result in creative conflict. Being the outcome of interaction between different skills and perspectives, creative conflict could boost better decision making, introduction of new ideas, and increased creativity. As the domino effect goes on, the performance of economic activities will be enhanced and therefore it will generate extra revenue. Besides extra revenue, culturally diverse society would also invigorate global linkage. Having people with various cultural backgrounds at the same place could possibly open international connection aiding the flow of labor, goods, and services. It will help to accelerate economic activities and products differentiation. International connection could broaden the market and the acceleration in economic activities will increase productivity.

All in all, multiculturalism is undeniably attached to the society and therefore it affects various aspects of the society. As for economic development, when widely accepted, cultural diversity generates a positive relationship. This argument has been examined by several studies and all of them agreed for the positive relationship, but varied in the level of its significance to economic development. As explained above, cultural diversity could enhance two main factors of economic development---GDP and market productivity. Increase in GDP resulted because cultural diversity tends to draw more interest in the services sector that contributes to GDP, such as tourism and education. Meanwhile, increase in market productivity resulted because cultural diversity constructs a firm global linkage which broadens the market and innovation which accelerates economic activities.

REFERENCES

Florida, Richard, 2008. Who's Your City?: How the Creative Economy Is Making Where You Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life. Basic Books: New York.

Fainstein, S., Powers, J., 2007. 'Tourism and New York's Ethnic Diversity: An Underutilized Resource?' in Rath, J. (ed.), Tourism, Ethnic Diversity and the City. Routledge: New York.

Hoffman, L., 2003. 'Revalorizing the Inner City: Tourism and Regulation In Harlem', in Hoffman, L., Fainstein, S., Judd, D. (eds.), Cities and Visitors: Regulating People, Markets and City Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Nieuwenhuyson, J., & Storer, D. 2011. The Economic Advantages of Cultural Diversity in Australia. Prepared for NSW Government and Community Relations Commission, Australia.

Syrett, S., Sepulveda, L., 2011. Realising the Diversity Dividend: Population Diversity and Urban Economic Development. Environment and Planning A, 43(2).

Steve., 2009. '12 Exciting Ethnic Enclaves and International Districts', https://weburbanist.com/2009/07/27/12-exciting-ethnic-enclaves-international-districts/

Florida, Richard, 2011. How Diversity Leads to Economic Growth. https://www.citylab.com/life/2011/12/diversity-leads-to-economic-growth/687/

Baca konten-konten menarik Kompasiana langsung dari smartphone kamu. Follow channel WhatsApp Kompasiana sekarang di sini: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaYjYaL4Spk7WflFYJ2H

HALAMAN :
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Money Selengkapnya
Lihat Money Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun