Is Politics Sacrificing Small Island Agriculture? The Hidden Cost of Local Elections in Maluku

One the candidates for regent promised to increase agricultural production by improving irrigation and opening new market access. However, after being elected, the policy focus shifted to tourism infrastructure development, which was considered more politically and economically profitable. As a result, the agricultural sector was again sidelined, and many farmers  felt disappointed by unfulfilled promises. They continue to rely on traditional farming methods, without adequate support from the government.

Imagine small islands as a home for a big family. Every family member has an important role in keeping the house running well. However, if the head of the family only focuses on beautifying the front yard to impress guests, while neglecting the kitchen where daily meals are prepared, soon the whole house will face problems. Agriculture on small islands is like that kitchen---a place that should be the main focus for sustaining life, but is often forgotten because it doesn't "sell" politically. 

To address this issue, fundamental changes are needed in how budget allocation and development policies are set, particularly in the context of regional elections.

Regional governments must ensure that budget allocations for the agricultural sector, especially on small islands, are balanced and sustainable. This means not only providing funds for short-term projects but also ensuring ongoing support through training, market access, and supporting infrastructure. Agricultural policies must be inclusive and involve all stakeholders, including farmers, fishermen, and indigenous communities on small islands. Their participation in planning and implementing programs will ensure that the policies made are truly aligned with their needs. 

Building local capacity through training and agricultural education focused on the specific needs of small islands will help create independent and innovative farmers. Additionally, decentralizing agricultural policies, where decisions are made closer to the local community, will ensure that the implemented programs are more relevant and effective.

The political landscape in regions like Maluku exerts a profound influence on development priorities, often to the detriment of agriculture on small islands. The harsh reality is that this sector frequently becomes a casualty of local elections, where short-term political gains overshadow the long-term needs of rural communities. Instead of serving as a catalyst for positive change, regional elections often reinforce the marginalization of these vital agricultural communities through unsustainable and exclusionary policies.

To break this cycle, regional leaders must fundamentally shift their approach. Agriculture on small islands should no longer be viewed as a mere political bargaining chip but as a critical sector that can drive lasting prosperity for the entire region. By recognizing and investing in the true potential of these islands, leaders can unlock sustainable development that benefits not only the local population but also contributes to broader regional and national progress. 

For whoever is elected as the new regional leader, a critical reassessment is required. The focus must shift from prioritizing urban infrastructure projects, which offer immediate visibility and political returns, to genuinely addressing the needs of small island agriculture. This involves recognizing agriculture not merely as a political tool but as a fundamental pillar of regional prosperity. 

Investing in rural infrastructure, supporting agricultural innovation, and ensuring equitable budget allocations are essential steps to unlocking the full potential of these communities. This is the only way to ensure that the hidden costs of local elections do not continue to sacrifice the future of small island agriculture in Maluku. Fingers Crossed...