Istilah - Istilah di Geografi Kebudayaan dan Identitas Tempat: part1

Anchorage identitas merujuk pada proses di mana identitas individu atau komunitas "dipasangkan" dengan tempat tertentu, menciptakan hubungan emosional yang kuat antara tempat dan identitas. Dalam konteks ini, identitas seseorang atau kelompok diperkuat oleh keterikatan dengan ruang geografis atau lingkungan spesifik, seperti kota, desa, atau wilayah tertentu (Hernndez et al., 2007). Konsep ini sering digunakan dalam studi keterikatan tempat (place attachment), di mana individu merasa memiliki dan menyelaraskan diri dengan suatu lokasi, sehingga identitas mereka terhubung erat dengan lingkungan tersebut. Contohnya, seseorang yang tumbuh dan tinggal di suatu kota akan mengasosiasikan dirinya dengan ciri-ciri kota tersebut sebagai bagian dari identitas pribadi atau kelompok. Anchorage identitas memainkan peran penting dalam memelihara rasa memiliki, stabilitas, dan keberlanjutan komunitas.

1. Bound Ruang Inklusif dan Eksklusif  

• Ruang Inklusif: Ruang yang terbuka bagi semua orang tanpa diskriminasi dan mendorong partisipasi sosial.  

• Ruang Eksklusif: Ruang yang membatasi akses bagi kelompok tertentu dan biasanya dikendalikan berdasarkan status sosial atau ekonomi (Vosko, 2016)

Referensi

• Hernndez, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2007.06.003
• Horvath, B., & Horvath, R. (2001). A multilocality study of a sound change in progress: The case of /l/ vocalization in New Zealand and Australian English. Language Variation and Change, 13(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394501131029
• Kabatek, J. (2023). What is an isogloss? Energeia: Online Journal for Linguistics, Language Philosophy, and History of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.55245/energeia.2023.004
• Light, D., & Young, C. (2015). Toponymy as commodity: Exploring the economic dimensions of urban place names. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 435--450. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12153
• Mazumdar, S., & Mazumdar, S. (1993). Sacred space and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(3), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80175-6
• Meeus, J. (1993). The transformation of agricultural landscapes in Western Europe. Science of The Total Environment, 129, 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(93)90169-7
• Ming, F. (2013). An interdisciplinary research into the characteristics of vernacular landscape. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology.
• Niglio, O., & Guerriero, L. (2019). Sacred places: Spaces for a dialogue among cultures. Resourceedings. https://doi.org/10.21625/resourceedings.v2i3.631
• Ogunseitan, O. A. (2004). Topophilia and the quality of life. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(2), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7467
• Oliveira, J. F., Roca, Z., & Leito, N. (2010). Identity and development: From topophilia to terraphilia. Land Use Policy, 27(4), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.10.014
• Perea, M. (2013). Dynamic cartography with diachronic data: Dialectal stratigraphy. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs060
• Sepe, M., & Pitt, M. (2014). The characters of place in urban design. Urban Design International, 19(3), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1057/UDI.2013.32
• imek, P., er, M., Fiedor, D., & Brisudov, L. (2020). To fear or not to fear? Exploring the temporality of topophobia in urban environments. Moravian Geographical Reports, 28(4), 308-321. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0023
• Terkulov, V. I. (2020). The study of urbanonymy in linguistic regional researches. Onomastics, 17(2), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.34216/2020-2.onomast.177-184
• Tuan, Y.-F. (1975). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Columbia University Press.
• Vosko, R. S. (2016). Standing on holy ground: Encountering revelation in sacred space. Liturgy, 31(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2015.1083799
• Westerdahl, C. (2022). Microcosms and borders -- On centrality and linearity in connection with holy or sacred places. Culture Crossroads. https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol5.223
• Xie, Q., Ursini, F., & Samo, G. (2023). Urbanonyms in Macao. Names. https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2023.2421