Why many academician is have not believe God? They are said, “we not believed God, because science answered all of question about creating.” Considered all thing that, we are to want used the basic questions to known truth about religion (God-meaning) and science. Among two choise that, many religion community certain science and to believing God is linier.
Be different, academician almost find fact believing God not relevant with nature fact. But this is as a finded with science logic. For example, Darwin was finding evolution theory as a wholly of his theory. The conclusion of his theory, all aspect biological human as well as manykind nature process is seems as a part of evolution process. The process showing step by step, start from basic condition to completly thing.
And for me, study about likely mostly academician perspective are very interested. And as a consequence, we must choise to believe nature fact or religious says. Many pepole bring this case with a perspective that study of religious are same or linier with ‘nature shows’. But i think it is not same. Perhaps like water and oil. In enlightement or before this period, Galileo was have a punishment because his theory about the sun as a central of whole is very different with doctrin catholic. Its mean, religion always push of all the world theory if the thesis on both side religion.
Become a difficult choises to me. Its seems strange, if more and more read a some book, i get many perspective or how to see a problem, but the problem seemed with a differ instrument. And for the last, we can got a truth explanation and lie sharing. But now, especially for me, this time are very dizizying. If we not believe God, we must carry on qonsequence in next time in judgement day, if the day is possible. And if we believe what the ‘kitab-koran’ says, we must kept mouth if found fact not compatible between religion and science says. I think most people asking same with my opinion in themselves. So, enjoy with your life, learn more and more.
