Diminished Community Dividends: Community members who invested in BUMDes shares noted a decline in annual dividends, with payouts decreasing from IDR 500,000 in the first year to IDR 400,000 in subsequent years. This decline, coupled with a lack of transparency regarding BUMDes profits, has fueled frustration among residents.
Community Outcry and Legal Proceedings
The allegations of mismanagement reached a tipping point when residents decided to pursue legal action. Efforts to mediate the conflict through forums facilitated by the Department of Community Empowerment and Villages (PMD) proved unsuccessful, as key issues remained unresolved. Consequently, the former village head was reported to law enforcement authorities, leading to an investigation into the alleged misappropriation of village assets.
In response to these allegations, the former village head has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. He contends that the accusations are baseless and politically motivated, asserting that all village assets under his custody remain intact. Despite his claims, the legal proceedings have cast a shadow over Sekapuk's reputation as a model village, highlighting the vulnerabilities inherent in rapid social and economic transformation.
Broader Implications for Social Transformation
The challenges faced by Sekapuk underscore the complexities of sustaining social transformation in rural communities. While the village's achievements in tourism and economic development are commendable, the current crisis reveals gaps in governance, accountability, and community engagement. These issues have several implications for Sekapuk's future:
Erosion of Trust: The allegations of mismanagement have eroded trust between community members and their leaders. Trust is a critical component of social capital, and its absence can hinder collective action and cooperation.
Impact on Social Cohesion: The leadership vacuum and unresolved disputes have created divisions within the community, undermining the unity that once drove Sekapuk's success.
Financial Vulnerability: The debts incurred by BUMDes and the allegations of asset mismanagement pose significant financial risks to the village. Without a clear strategy for debt repayment, Sekapuk's economic stability may be compromised.
Challenges in Leadership Transition: The delay in appointing a new village head has highlighted the need for a transparent and inclusive leadership transition process. The absence of a strong leader has left the village without a clear vision for the future.
Recommendations for Moving Forward