In 2019, Indonesia began its ambitious journey to redefine its education system by introducing the zoning system. The policy, which aims to reduce the gap in education access and equity, requires students to attend schools within the closest radius of their residence. While this initiative brings significant benefits, it also raises controversies and questions: Is this system a key to equality in education, or does it exacerbate existing disparities?
Aiming for Equity
The zoning system emerged as a response to the glaring gap between “favorite” schools, that known for their academic excellence and well-off students, while the ordinary” schools known with they limited resources. By distributing students based on their geographical proximity, the government envisioned a future where schools were no longer categorized based on merit, but based on equal opportunity.
For many people, this approach proved to be a life-changer for them. It reduces their financial burden by minimizing travel costs and provides access to quality education for underprivileged students who might otherwise be excluded. Parents find it easier to supervise their children, and schools begin to see a diverse mix of students, promoting community cohesion.
Rift Lines
However, cracks began to appear when the zoning system was launched. Disparities in school facilities and teacher competencies in different regions have hampered the system's ability to achieve its goals. Fraudulent practices, such as manipulating residential addresses, further undermined its credibility.
Students also reported that they felt trapped in a system that limited their options and many lost their motivation to excel. Teachers began to face challenges in adapting to classrooms with diverse student abilities, which often hampered the quality of education.
The Policies that Keep Changing
Despite these challenges, the zoning system has prompted a national discussion on inclusivity in education. Recent statements by government officials, including Vice President Gibran Rakabuming, have called for a re-evaluation of the policy. Suggestions range from abolishing the system to using modern solutions such as digital learning tools to address its shortcomings.
The zoning system's journey is far from over. It has highlighted the complexity of balancing equity with quality education. To truly succeed, Indonesia must invest in strengthening school infrastructure, improving teacher training and encouraging community engagement. With comprehensive reforms, the zoning system can evolve into a powerful model for equitable education.
As Indonesia contemplates the future of this policy, the world is watching closely. Will it be a beacon of change or a cautionary tale? Only time will tell.
