Mohon tunggu...
Mr. Purwalodra
Mr. Purwalodra Mohon Tunggu... Lecturer -

My name is Purwalodra. I am a student at STBA CHP. My real name is Muhammad Eko Purwanto. I like writing on internet marketing. I live in Indonesia and is ready to look for business partners. However, matters relating to the technical blog and others, I still much to learn. That's why this article is very useful to me. Thanks.

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Sosbud

House Energy 1

15 September 2011   16:55 Diperbarui: 26 Juni 2015   01:56 25
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Bagikan ide kreativitasmu dalam bentuk konten di Kompasiana | Sumber gambar: Freepik

The Basic Facts Of House Energy

By. Weerad D. Arma. [caption id="attachment_130254" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="House Energy "][/caption]

In 1999, paleoclimatologist Michael Mann released a report today that concludes that humans have a lot of increase in temperature is continuously globally. Mr. Mann believes that our earth experienced a series of warming and cooling periods throughout the world. However, Mr Mann asserted that humans have caused an alarming increase in world temperatures. It also sparked some media hype, even inspiring for a movie.

In the building energy committee in the report Wegman, Scott and Said significantly through statistical means that Mr. Mann's report, replete with statistical errors and that the methodology used could also build a similar conclusion with other data types. Three people who make a report about the climate and assigned to review the reports from the mathematical point of view. They really proved that the methodology and calculations made by Mr Mann biased and does not generate the chart "hockey stick".

This, of course, cause a lot of people question the reason why most of the climate research community remain silent about such differences. Meanwhile, the energy of the building committee reported Wegman, Scott and Said does not only provide information about why Mr. Mann's theory is invalid. It also seeks to explain the social networking statistics of climate research organization, with the reason why only two climate theories put forward to question Mr. Mann. In fact, the theory of Mr. Mann is a dream of a distinctive climate, which revealed about a global disaster caused by climatic conditions. This, of course, puts Mr. Mann in the middle of the climate research community.

Please note, that the climate community has obtained a report that caused them to avoid doing a critical study. When you look at this case, you can draw some conclusions and lessons. From these cases it can be concluded that:

1. Apparently ignorance is a bliss.

Often people prefer not to question the idea that affect them so much. People prefer to be told that it would be fine than see for themselves, for fear of finding something worse.

Some people prefer to live in a fantastic dream of the terrible reality. In fact we may not look so good, but why would anyone trade the truth for a dream?. That is one question that invites us to think about it, but afraid to answer.

2. A fresh eye never hurts.

We all regard ourselves as the best judge of the reality of our lives. However, as the House energy committee report by Wegman Scott and Said have hinted, that we all need to have the view that far ahead. "For there is nothing more deceptive than the heart." We all need a reality check from someone else from time to time because we tend to be blind to ourselves.

HALAMAN :
  1. 1
  2. 2
Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Sosbud Selengkapnya
Lihat Sosbud Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun