Should Eng Breaking Replace English Teachers in Schools?

Who doesn't know Eng Breaking? If you don't know, I will tell you a little about it. Eng Breaking is a blended English course that is so viral nowadays due to so many supporting testimonies toward this program. Thousands of students and workers use it to improve their English in just three months. By practicing English  in 15-30 minutes per day, it's users are so successful in using English language well. 

This program contains three techniques: 

1. Deep listening (This technique will make the users active, listening to English utterance which is speeded from slow to fast so that they can understand pronunciation and intonation easily and understand what is said by native speakers).

2. Catching up (Practice pronouncing each word at a speed set from slow to fast correctly, and practice using the correct intonation in each sentence)

3. Rapid response (In this technique, the users will practice listening to English sentences, understand and then respond quickly without having to waste time thinking too long).

(Cited from: Menghilangkan Rasa Takut Berbahasa Inggris dalam waktu hanya 3 Bulan. (2020, November 12). Retrieved from engbreaking.com) 

Those  three techniques are so effective for learning English language. Most users who couldn't speak at all and even did not have self confidence in speaking English, now they can get both: the self confidence and the ability to speak the language. Well done for Eng Breaking.

Talking about learning English, we have to consider that  language learning is habitual learning. The more we use it, the more fluent we will be. This belief is applied by Eng Breaking and it works well. What about learning the language in schools? Do schools fail?

English is not first or second language among us. It is a foreign language. Some say that it is an 'alien' language since it's very difficult to understand by most of students. The students (who have graduated from senior high schools) exactly have learned it for about 12-14  years but still the results are far from expected. Still, many students cannot use the language well, even they don't get the point yet about the language usage.

I have been teaching English for about 20 years but I feel I did not do well in my teaching. It was not because I was bad but rather the situation and the curriculum 'led' me to the 'failure'. It is not wise to blame the situation and curriculum because they just happened in accordance with the era at the time. Now the era changes, the situation changes and the English curriculum should be changed. 

Since I was an undergraduate student, I have been so familiar with the proverb that language learning is habitual learning. But, the reality gives different spot. In public schools, English is not taught everyday but just twice or three times a week. Even now, English is taught only once a week based on Curriculum 2013 for vocational students. So?