Furthermore, the symbolic significance of the presidential vehicle choice can have broader political implications, both domestically and internationally. The Maung Pindad's association with the military and its rugged, utilitarian design may be perceived as projecting a certain image of strength and resilience, which could be advantageous for the government in some contexts. Conversely, the use of a military-oriented vehicle may also raise concerns about the militarization of the government or the prioritization of defense interests over civilian needs.
Ultimately, the decision to mandate the Maung Pindad as the official vehicle for the President and government ministers must carefully balance the practical considerations with the broader sociocultural and political implications. Engaging with the public, experts, and diverse stakeholders can help policymakers navigate this complex landscape and develop a comprehensive strategy that aligns with the country's overarching goals and values.
Alternatives and Future Considerations
As the government explores the implementation of the Maung Pindad mandate, it may also be worthwhile to consider alternative vehicle options that could offer a more balanced approach. One potential alternative could be the development of a specialized, high-performance, and environmentally-friendly government vehicle that combines the desired attributes of the Maung Pindad, such as security and ruggedness, with enhanced fuel efficiency, comfort, and accessibility for government officials and their staff. This could involve incorporating design features that enhance comfort, fuel efficiency, and accessibility, while still maintaining the vehicle's core capabilities and the government's commitment to domestically-produced products. The expanded capabilities and customized features would help ensure the vehicles meet the diverse needs of government officials, from transporting dignitaries to accommodating accessibility requirements, all while showcasing Indonesia's domestic manufacturing expertise.
References
Bashir Shaikh, F., Rehman, M., Amin, A., Shamim, A., & Ahmed Hashmani, M. (2021). Cyberbullying Behaviour: A Study of Undergraduate University Students. In F. Bashir Shaikh, M. Rehman, A. Amin, A. Shamim, & M. Ahmed Hashmani, IEEE Access (Vol. 9, p. 92715). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3086679Â
Febransyah, A. (2021). Predicting Purchase Intention towards Battery Electric Vehicles: A Case of Indonesian Market. In A. Febransyah, World Electric Vehicle Journal (Vol. 12, Issue 4, p. 240). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj12040240Â
Kusumawaty, I., Yunike, Y., Elviani, Y., & Arifin, H. (2021). Contributing Factors of Cyberbullying Behavior among Youths During Covid-19. In I. Kusumawaty, Y. Yunike, Y. Elviani, & H. Arifin, Jurnal Ners (Vol. 16, Issue 1, p. 54). Airlangga University. https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v16i1.24751Â
Marwiyah, S., & Rengganis, V. M. (2021). Policy Formulation on Accelerating the Development of Electric Motor Vehicles. In S. Marwiyah & V. M. Rengganis, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211221.015Â
Nasywa, N., Tentama, F., & Mujidin, M. (2021). WHAT MAKES THE CYBERBULLYING MODEL AMONG VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. In N. Nasywa, F. Tentama, & M. Mujidin, Cakrawala Pendidikan: jurnal ilmiah pendidikan (Vol. 40, Issue 2, p. 329). State University of Yogyakarta. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.34549Â
Ravallion, M. (2003). The Debate on Globalization, Poverty and Inequality: Why Measurement Matters. In M. Ravallion, International affairs (Vol. 79, Issue 4, p. 739). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00334Â