Transparent and ethical financial management is a critical foundation in maintaining public trust in companies, especially in those operating in strategic sectors. One of the notable cases that tarnished business ethics and corporate governance in Indonesia was the Krakatau Steel procurement scandal. This incident became a major focus as it exposed weaknesses in oversight and the ethical culture within a state-owned enterprise (SOE) that should serve as a model for good governance.
Chronology of the Case:
Krakatau Steel, a state-owned steel company, was involved in a scandal in 2019 concerning the procurement of goods that were carried out non-transparently and fraudulently. The then CEO of PT Krakatau Steel, along with several other employees, was implicated in manipulating procurement tenders that caused significant financial losses to the state. The scheme involved approving procurement tenders worth billions of rupiah for certain unqualified parties, which had been predetermined. The perpetrators received bribes to award the contracts to these preselected suppliers, ignoring legitimate procedures.
This action violated the fundamental principles of procurement, namely efficiency, transparency, and accountability. Moreover, this fraud highlighted a breach of business ethics, where conflicts of interest and personal gains were prioritized over corporate and public interests.
Ethics in Financial Oversight:
The Krakatau Steel scandal demonstrates how loose financial oversight can significantly impact a company's credibility. Essentially, good oversight not only involves accurate financial reporting but also requires honest and transparent processes. Auditors, both internal and external, play a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of a company's financial reports. However, in this case, gaps in the oversight system increased the potential for fraud.
Additionally, good corporate governance must involve a strong commitment to corporate ethical codes. In the case of Krakatau Steel, there was a clear failure to establish a culture that emphasized the importance of business ethics. The inability to prevent and detect fraudulent behavior underscored the company's weak internal controls.
Impact of the Scandal on Company Reputation and Finances
Every financial scandal leaves a wide-ranging impact, both on the reputation and the financial condition of the company. Krakatau Steel experienced significant losses, not only through inefficient expenditures but also indirectly through the loss of investor and public trust. As a result of this scandal, the company's image as an SOE, which should uphold the highest standards of ethics and professionalism, was tarnished.
In addition to material losses, the impact on stakeholders was significant. Employees not involved in the scandal might suffer demotivation and decreased morale, while suppliers and customers could lose faith in the company’s credibility.
