Juridical Analysis of Indictments and the Application of Law in Crime

In the formulation of the indictment, the prosecutor as the public prosecutor should be more thorough, careful, and clear because the indictment is the crown of the public prosecutor to argue the criminal act committed by the defendant. As actory in cumbit probation that who is arguing, he is the one who must be obliged to prove it. 

Therefore, the public prosecutor is expected to be ready with evidence to support his indictment so that the charges are based on facts that can be presented at trial. law, it is necessary to think progressively in hearing and deciding cases, where judges are also considered to know all the laws so that the court should not refuse to examine and try cases (Ius Curia Novit / Curia Novit Jus). 

Judges must also listen to both parties (Audi Et Alteram Partem) So that the judge in giving a decision a the bag of evidence that can give him confidence does not only see the sense of justice for the victim, but also whether the crime also provides a sense of justice for the defendant. Therefore, it is hoped that the judges will judge and more carefully, thoroughly, and wisely. The existence of legal certainty, justice and equality before the law is sought to be realized.