Understanding The Struggles of Classroom Discourse Analysis

Classroom discourse analysis with time has proved to be an essential tool in exploring the acts of learning through spoken and unspoken words within an educational environment. It offers ideas on student interactions, methods of teaching, and even the flow of a classroom itself. Nevertheless, it is essential to point out that administering classroom discourse analysis is not without its slices of pie as the following reveals. They are varied in that they include methodological problems, technological difficulties, administrative factors, and even ethical questions.

Major difficulty in studying classroom discourse is how to choose and use the methods for the observation and analysis. Furthermore, classroom interactions are still very many and cannot be typed verbatim, let alone the gestures and conducts showing the interaction.

Some of the models that are used in the analysis of the discourse include Sinclair and Coulthard's discourse analysis model including the IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback) as well as Gee's Discourse Model. However, there are some peculiarities in all of them as well as certain limitations that should be mentioned. For example, the uses of the IRF model are criticized for being mechanical with the possibility of overlooking the nuances of the open-ended or even collaborative classroom discussions. Without properly selecting the framework, someone is likely to draw the wrong conclusions that in turn distorts the observations made concerning the classroom environment.

Technological supports for classroom discourse analysis have changed with the advent of the new generation classrooms and the COVID-19 pandemic hit forcing instructors to adopt new methods of teaching and learning technological tools for classroom discourse analysis. However, this technological progress carries its own challenges.

When recording tools are available, there still could be technical issues. Inaccurate data can be obtained where there is a low-quality sound in the video, image blurring during the class, or interruption by other concurrent class activities. Finally, when conducting the classroom discourse analysis in online or blended context, it is also a possibility that due to technical difficulties like connectivity issues, low or no internet bandwidth, students may switch off the cameras or teacher might face problems like low sound quality or may record it with constant interruptions in sound, that all lead to gaps or inaccuracies in the data collected. For example, before the COVID-19 pandemic, many educators experienced these problems while trying to conduct the analysis of interactions in virtual classrooms, which is challenging. 

There is one significant cause of concern with regards to administration and that is the permission to record the interactions in the classroom. In many organizations, especially in educational institutions, obtaining permission from the school authorities, teachers, parents and the learners may take a long time especially when it is a public school. As will be seen in the subsequent sections of the paper, issues of ethical nature like protection of anonymity of students and their voluntary participation, further complicate the process of conducting discourse analysis. For instance, a recent case in one of the U. S. school districts where a number of classroom recordings were prohibited because of student concern despite the permission of most of the stakeholders. 

Classroom discourse analysis may be rather time-intensive. This involves activities from the actual physically setting up the recording equipment to transcribe and code the data collected takes time as well as resources. Some schools may not have the financial capacity or the human capital to conduct such analysis; this is especially so in areas that have limited funding for schools. For instance, the teachers were receptive to the discourse analysis but due to dearth of resources and human resources they could not effectively actualize it.

Discourse in the classroom is culturally and socially constructed, therefore it becomes critical for discourse analysis to take this into consideration so that results that are generated do not reflect biases. Hence, the classrooms in most of the regions or countries are found to have different patterns of discourse. For example, an interaction between teacher and student in the US classroom could be compared to the one in the East Asia where students are expected to be less assertive and polite even when interacting with their teacher. One can easily fail to see the latent implications of these cultural differences hence failing to correctly understand the environment of the classroom. There is evidence that there are variations in sample characteristics and it is for this reason, researchers must be sensitive to these differences as they plan the different phases of the research study. 

Pertaining to ethical considerations, these also have an important implication on the process of administering classroom discourse analysis. Pupil's right to privacy has to be respected, the participants have to be given consent to participate in the study and any identification details and other personal sensitive information have to be protected. However, when lecturing students or other vulnerable groups like disabled students the application of discourse analysis should be done very carefully because using so simplified models of possible discourses may lead to stigmatization of these groups. 

 Therefore, classroom discourse analysis is an activity that raises a number of methodological, technological, administrative and ethical issues and concerns when administered. Even though there are these challenges, the importance that comes with analyzing the discourse patterns in the classroom cannot be overemphasized. It can also be said that with time, these drawbacks are likely to be phased out due to further development of technology and improvements of research methodologies in the context of education. However, for the present time, educational institutions and researchers are to combine their efforts, invest into proper resources, and respect the ethical and cultural issues for implementing the classroom discourse analysis.

References: