Mohon tunggu...
Deci Fitri
Deci Fitri Mohon Tunggu... Mahasiswa - Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

International Relations 23 Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Ilmu Sosbud

Controversy over the Determination of Sharia Regional Regulations in Several Regions: Pros and Cons

2 Juli 2024   18:14 Diperbarui: 2 Juli 2024   18:19 20
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Bagikan ide kreativitasmu dalam bentuk konten di Kompasiana | Sumber gambar: Freepik

Yogyakarta, 2 July 2024  -- A wave of controversy has hit a number of regions in Indonesia again after several regional governments passed Sharia Regional Regulations (Perda). This regulation has become a hot topic of debate in society, with strong arguments from both sides regarding its relevance and impact on social and political life.

In Aceh, as the only province in Indonesia that fully implements Islamic law, the implementation of Sharia Regional Regulations is no longer something new. However, other regions such as Tasikmalaya and Bima are now participating in implementing similar regulations. This gave rise to various reactions, both support and rejection from various groups.

Pro-Sharia Regional Regulation:
          

          Supporters of the Sharia Regional Regulation argue that this regulation is a manifestation of religious freedom and the right to regional autonomy. They believe that implementing Islamic law can improve morality and strengthen the Islamic identity of local communities. One of the religious figures, Ustadz Ahmad Maulana, stated, "The Sharia Regional Regulation is a form of implementation of Islamic values that are in line with the majority of the population of this area. This will lead the community to a better and more orderly life."

Cons of Sharia Regulations:

          On the other hand, strong opposition came from human rights activists and several community groups who were worried about the discrimination and injustice that might arise. They argued that implementing Sharia Regional Regulations in diverse regions could threaten national diversity and unity. Siti Nurhaliza, a human rights activist, stated, "Sharia regional regulations have the potential to cause injustice towards minorities and women. We must ensure that laws in Indonesia remain based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution which uphold justice and equality."

Central Government Response:

          The central government through the Minister of Home Affairs, Mr. Muhammad Ridwan, stated that every regional regulation must be in harmony with the national constitution and must not conflict with the principles of diversity. "We will carry out a thorough evaluation of the Sharia Regional Regulations implemented in various regions to ensure that there are no violations of human rights and the principles of the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia," he stressed.

          In conclusion, the Sharia Regional Regulation controversy shows how complex political and social dynamics are in Indonesia. On the one hand, there is a desire to accommodate the religious aspirations of the majority, but on the other hand, there is a need to maintain the principles of diversity and justice. How things develop further will depend largely on constructive dialogue between the various parties to reach a fair and sustainable solution.

Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Ilmu Sosbud Selengkapnya
Lihat Ilmu Sosbud Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun