Competition in the Republic: From Socialists to Celebrities
Socialism, workers are the group whose life's needs are voiced by scholars such as Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Khomeini, Soekarno, etc., to determine the direction of the country, not the working class itself that is told to think, why is the working class told to think. Aidit was a scholar, and no one doubts that Aidit was a genius. However, when he equated everyone without any appreciation for the educated people who had different political flags, that was the beginning of his party's disaster (although that was not a sin that made Harto worthy of genociding more than 2 million PKI sympathizers in a barbaric manner). That was the damage to the brain of the PKI movement; that is why scholars castrated them. The Muhammadiyah and Persis people were reformist preachers who wanted to embrace the proletariat to become ulama' without any religious aristocrats and unclear sands; HMI also wanted to develop every Muslim without regard to social class (before the Nurcholish Madjid era), in fact by PKI Aidit these scholars were confronted in social conflict with unskilled workers from factories and plantations who were not trained to think and were short-tempered. True socialism is like Hitler's socialism, whose orientation is to remove the German nation from the poverty/proletarian line—not exploiting and politicizing the proletariat to lead the nation. How can you order people whose instincts are sharp and whose reasoning is dull, people who are still half animalistic, to be embraced as human beings as leaders of the nation? Surely, they will become corrupt. The elite is the elite; there is no proletariat to become the elite. Social Republic, social democracy, and social revolution are the struggles of the pro-proletariat elite. Muhammadi SAW is pro-poor and wants to prosper regardless of poverty regardless of the working class. So, the difference in political ideology is the difference in what group is being fought for and how far they will fight for that group. Not the lower class, stupid people, barbarians just because they have much time, joining youth organizations here and there and then being told to lead the country. Do you want to build a gangster republic? Tragically, who is the leader of our MPR now? I am talking about the ongoing decay.
It should be noted that almost all of our community organizations that were established at the beginning of Indonesia's independence were nationalist socialists because they were branches of the thoughts of the Cokro Islamic Association. Even Masyumi was a socialist before being possessed by the Muslim Brotherhood. If, at that time, they were both socialists who fought for the proletariat, why didn't they unite? If, at that time, they were both communists, why didn't they unite Hatta, Soekarno, Tan Malaka, Syahrir, Hamka, etc.? That is human greed. Our leaders at that time no longer thought about the progress of the nation, but their respective seats, groups, ethnicities, and stomachs. Just think about their ideas; they are all socialists, and they are all children of the modern Islamic association (Abduh). However, they are divided just because some are Javanese there; some are Mining here, some are in the office, some are not, some are popular there, and some are starting to fade here. When people only think about the existence of their reputation alone, forgetting that they have won the ideas of independence from Dutch feudalism, with socialism and Islamic revivalism. The left began to pawn their leftism by bringing the ideology of the caliphate. Think about them, the children of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab, the children of Abduh, the children of Iqbal, the children of Ahmad Dahlan and Cokroaminoto who overthrew the hegemony of Sunni Ottoman feudalism with nationalism and modernism. They even wanted to re-establish the caliphate like the Ottomans.
The effects of past hypocrisy, destroying the old order ideologues and elevating people like Soeharto who have a big tent view. A big tent means that politics is no longer ideological. Post-reformation has become even worse because reform has no philosophical roots; why should it be an American democracy? Why should the president be elected directly? This means that the government's mandate is no longer from Parliament. So, Parliament loses the authority of the people's mandate to criticize the government. So, Parliament is just a clown in the reform era. So its contents are not smart people who are tasked with criticizing the government they elected. Finally, now, many unclear people will enter Parliament. Starting from workers who have just returned from being migrant workers, traders of basic necessities with KUR capital, and artists (low quality) because they have two variables, namely having money and being famous. The government's political party should be in the form of a single party like the Chinese communist party, and that party should not be in Parliament. The function of the government party is only to produce candidates for the nation's crown prince, who will be later submitted to Parliament and elected. Parliament has its political party mechanism; faction competition only exists in Parliament. Parliament and government become different chambers. Not Golkar's Parliament and Golkar's government like the New Order, or PDI's Parliament and PDI's government like the era of the seventh president.
At least in the future, members of the Indonesian House of Representatives, the president, and ministers must be educated at the Doctoral/S3 level from reputable campuses. So that this country will not be extinct in the future because most idiots fill its official seats. Understand that Parliament is a collection of philosophers representing their people from Sabang to Merauke. The number of DPR RI electoral districts must also be equalized between provinces. So that Java does not become arrogant because Java's votes are the same as the votes of the NAD parliament and the West Papua Parliament.
The question is, why do people choose idiots to sit in Parliament and government? Because the party does not put up barriers for anyone to join its party. However, to become an official/legislative candidate, putting up barriers must have campaign capital of so and so. The installation of a threshold for parties that can nominate a president and vice president is also why tomorrow, we will be very embarrassed when we see a photo of the vice president in our office space. A great nation with ancestors of Phitecantropus Erectus (Javanese Man), who is the oldest race of Adam's children who still exist on this earth, numbering 300 million souls, is led by a clown.
Look at our political parties filled with stupid people, cheaters, and mafia who, just because they have money to bribe the people, the party nominate them as candidates for state political officials. Where are the good people? Where are the people with ideas? They are relegated from the competition because political parties that pass the threshold do not need candidates with ideas but candidates with money. So, whoever becomes the leader of the Republic in the future is logically a slave to Cabebol—the roots of internal Jewish colonialism in Europe for 500 years.
Who can castrate this system? Of course, revolutionaries like Napoleon and Hitler. He entered the stupid French democracy cell, becoming one of the directors of the French government. He then appointed himself as the French emperor. He destroyed the invisible hand, such as the VOC, the Orthodox saints, church feudalism, Freemasonry, etc., who control the European leadership as now Cabebol makes the leaders of America, Indonesia and South Korea his puppets.
Is this independence? We free ourselves from the Dutch who colonized us with thoughts and fears of military threats. In the future, our thoughts will no longer be afraid of the nobility but of the rich. In the past, the capitalists hid behind the authority of the lackeys of the nobility, who were made tumenggung by the VOC. Now, the capitalists immediately form the bastard Koreas as their henchmen. No more nobility as the determinant of social class; there is only money as the determinant of political victory. The proletariat is silent; they are confused that there are no more feudal classes in Urban society, but why do they still not feel free? Because, in reality, humans are the same. The nobility and the proletariat, who become the lackeys of the capitalists, are both tyrannical because they devote themselves to Satanism.
A republican isn't necessarily not tyrannical; a dictator like Hitler and Soekarno is not necessarily tyrannical because tyranny is an evil leader who is leading the country. Great people like Alexander the Great, Suleyman al Qanuni, and Napoleon Bonaparte, even though they were not "republicans", were freedom fighters for their people. Because they were good people who wanted good for their nation, they were releasing the shackles of poverty and ignorance on their nation forever. Compare it with our current leader; he is president of the Republic, and he rose in direct elections, but he embedded Neo colonialism and imperialism capitalism of immigrant and foreign nations in his nation, just for the sake of getting financial backers so that he and his descendants can reign forever in the stupid American democratic politics in our Republic.
Is this Plato's democracy? True democracy is freedom of speech and decisions by consensus; That is all. The question is whether England is more democratic than this country because it is a monarchy. England is an example of true Greek democracy. We need a cult figure to be able to lead a war in a country, like a King or a Prophet/Imamah. We also need a government executor like the President of Iran and the Prime Minister of England; we also need a parliament that is purely a parliament because no party in Parliament is the same as the government party. A parliament that is the same as the Parliament of Athens.