Copenhagen's Securitization Theory View on Contemporary Issues

Barry Buzan's securitization theory, primarily developed within the framework of the Copenhagen School, is a significant concept in international relations that examines how certain subjects become seen as matters of security. The theory posits that by declaring something as a security issue, a state or actor can claim a need for and justify extraordinary measures to deal with the perceived threat. This process is termed a "securitizing move," and it involves an actor, usually a state or its leaders, presenting an issue as an existential threat that requires urgent action beyond the bounds of normal political procedures.

The theory was extensively developed in the 1990s by Buzan, along with Ole Wver and Jaap de Wilde, among others. It suggests that the act of securitization is not automatic but rather is contingent upon the acceptance of the audience, which can be the public or other states. If the audience accepts the issue as a security threat, then the issue is successfully securitized.

Historical events that could be associated with securitization theory include: The Cold War, the global standoff between the Eastern and Western blocs can be seen as a macro-securitization, where diverse and local security issues were framed within the larger East-West ideological conflict. The COVID-19 Pandemic, the health crisis was securitized by many countries, resulting in emergency measures that restricted freedoms in ways that would be unacceptable under normal circumstances. Securitization theory has been applied to a wide range of issues beyond military threats, including environmental challenges, migration, and even health, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. It remains a dynamic area of study, with scholars examining the implications of securitization in various contexts and its impact on international relations and domestic politics.

Then, what about environmental issues? Is it possible that climate change could lead to securitization?

Yes, environmental issues, particularly climate change, can indeed lead to securitization. The concept of securitization has been extended beyond traditional military threats to include environmental challenges, which are increasingly seen as security issues. Climate change, due to its far-reaching impacts on ecosystems, economies, and societies, has been framed as a security threat by various actors, including states, international organizations, and researchers.

The securitization of climate change is evident in several ways:

• Policy Framing: Climate change is often framed as an existential threat that requires urgent and exceptional policy responses. This can lead to the adoption of measures that prioritize climate issues as security concerns at national and international levels.
• Resource Allocation: By securitizing climate change, governments can justify the reallocation of resources, including financial, military, and technological, to address climate-related security risks.
• International Cooperation: The perception of climate change as a security threat can foster international cooperation, as it becomes a shared concern that transcends national border.

However, the securitization of climate change is a double-edged sword. While it can mobilize action and resources, it can also lead to militarized responses or divert attention from the underlying causes of climate change. It's important to approach the securitization of climate change critically, ensuring that it leads to sustainable and equitable solutions rather than exacerbating existing inequalities or conflicts.

In summary, climate change can and has been securitized, reflecting the growing recognition of its potential to destabilize nations, economies, and global peace. The challenge lies in managing this securitization in a way that promotes comprehensive and long-term security for all.

This theory illustrates the power of securitizing moves and the critical role of the audience in legitimizing responses to perceived threats, extending beyond traditional military concerns to encompass economic, health, and environmental issues. The key is managing securitization to promote long-term security for all.